A court in Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia, has sentenced transgender TikTok influencer Ratu Thalisa to two years and ten months in prison for blasphemy and hate speech against Christianity. The verdict, delivered on March 10, 2025, also includes a fine of 100 million Indonesian Rupiah (approximately $6,200).
What Happened?
On October 2, 2024, during a TikTok livestream, Ratu Thalisa, known online as Ratu Entok, responded to a viewer’s comment about her appearance by holding up a picture of Jesus Christ and stating: “You should not look like a woman. You should cut your hair so that you will look like his father.” This remark led five Christian groups to file blasphemy complaints, resulting in her arrest on October 10, 2024.
Why It’s Important
This case underscores the contentious application of Indonesia’s blasphemy laws, particularly concerning freedom of expression on social media platforms. The sentencing of a transgender Muslim woman for comments about a central figure in Christianity highlights the law’s broad reach and raises concerns about its potential to suppress diverse viewpoints.
What Experts Say
Usman Hamid, Executive Director of Amnesty International Indonesia, criticized the verdict, stating: “This prison sentence is a shocking attack on Ratu Thalisa’s freedom of expression. The Indonesian authorities should not use the country’s Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT) law to punish people for comments made on social media.”
What’s Next
Prosecutors have appealed the verdict, seeking a longer sentence. The case has sparked debates about the necessity of revising Indonesia’s blasphemy and electronic information laws to better protect freedom of expression. Human rights organizations continue to advocate for the repeal or substantial amendment of these laws to prevent their misuse against minority groups.
Conclusion
The sentencing of Ratu Thalisa highlights ongoing tensions between Indonesia’s blasphemy laws and freedom of expression. As legal proceedings continue, this case may influence future interpretations and applications of laws governing online speech and religious sensitivity.